![]() ![]() However, strong and sustained reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2) and other greenhouse gases would limit climate change. Many of the changes observed in the climate are unprecedented in thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years, and some of the changes already set in motion-such as continued sea level rise-are irreversible over hundreds to thousands of years. Email him at to reprint this blog post in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author (or authors) and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy are properly cited.GENEVA, Aug 9 – Scientists are observing changes in the Earth’s climate in every region and across the whole climate system, according to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Report, released today. James David Dickson is managing editor of Michigan Capitol Confidential. The next time a politician says they’ll stop the rise of the oceans, remember this moment. Remember what the government told you it couldn’t do: Find one little leaker. ![]() ![]() Grand plans and no execution. Where did all that ambition go? When the court suffered an “extraordinary betrayal,” its investigators came home with empty notebooks.įinding a leaker is easier than “leaving no child behind” or changing global climate. Just say no, and investigators will take you at your word. Rather than deter the next leak, the court’s response invites it. Unable.Īnd then the court announces this inability to the world. After a grave breach of the Supreme Court’s trust, its investigators were unable to find the leaker, among a small cohort of people. Then they backed off, perhaps thinking the professionals would take it from there. The night of the leak, Twitter sleuths made smart, educated guesses on who the leaker might be, based on the reporter who broke the story, and known interactions of court clerks with the reporter. If everybody denies doing it, guess that’s that. On this basis, I did not believe that it was necessary to ask the justices to sign sworn affidavits.”Ī leak, but no leaker. Curley said “I followed up on all credible leads, none of which implicated the justices or their spouses. The nine Supreme Court justices were interviewed too, but weren’t asked to sign statements. Investigators interviewed 97 employees and got 97 denials. Related reading: If governors can’t fix global inflation, they can’t stop global viruses.What’s wrong with this picture: The highest court in these United States suffers an “extraordinary betrayal of trust,” and nobody is brought to justice? And the court is admitting to all of this publicly? A leak, but no leaker? The report notes that “the team has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.” So why did the leak investigation end in failure? Grave assaults are pretty serious, and one would expect a serious response. Supreme Court report on investigation into May 2022 leak “It was a grave assault on the judicial process.” “The leak was no mere misguided attempt at protest,” the court said in a report on the leak. Wade ruling and the federal constitutional right to abortion it created. Supreme Court, in its own words, “suffered one of the worst breaches of trust in its history” when someone leaked a draft opinion in the Dobbs case. But government is not in the problem-solving business. president stands at a podium and announces a plan for regime change in foreign lands, or to eradicate climate change, you should know that’s far beyond their paygrade. You should understand titles like “The Inflation Reduction Act” to be fictitious, not a comment on what will happen after a law is passed. Any government project bigger than building a road should draw your skepticism. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |